The new DEFI platform enters the market! Earn passively - token sale 0.25 $ I'm going in!

Bitcoin’s carbon footprint hard to evaluate

By
Redakcja
-
5 min reading

The effect of BTC mining on the environment has now turned into an argument and this is what the academics think about if “green Bitcoin” is possible. This argument around the environmental impact of the Bitcoin mining ecosystem is getting attention as the academic have come up with new set of opinions on the subject.

The effect of BTC mining on the environment has now turned into an argument and this is what the academics think about if “green Bitcoin” is possible. This argument around the environmental impact of the Bitcoin mining ecosystem is getting attention as the academic have come up with new set of opinions on the subject. In an opinion piece by Noah Smith, a former assistant finance professor turned columnist openly spoke about the Bitcoin (BTC) mining industry in March, proving that the constant growing energy consumption of the network is now unsustainable. Smiths said that more countries will focus on Bitcoin mining as they use more power as the increasing price of BTC is constantly matched with the rising hash rates. 

Nic Carter the founder of Coin Metrics has denied some of the points raised in Smith’s column, there is still some double opinion around the amount of energy that Bitcoin mining pulls out. The main sources for this energy and the carbon footprint are the industry on the planet. The mining industry is considered as the downplay to the extent of its resource-intensive work and most of the industry insiders have mentioned that talk of Bitcoin’s environmental impact is not really a problem and the data shows a large share of hash power brings in energy from renewable sources. 

However, environmental advocates are focusing on the industry in return, which has shown a somewhat unending debate on the matter. According to some of the academics in the area who have expressed their opinion on the matter for instance, those behind the Cambridge Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index, have turned out to be a reference point for the estimated power consumption of the Bitcoin network, even though there are some self-confessed limitations. Nevertheless, Aalborg University Ph.D. fellow Susanne Kohler and associate professor Massimo Pizzol co-wrote a study named “life cycle Assessment of Bitcoin Mining” this gave some details driven assumptions about the environmental impact of the industry. 

Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance crypto asset and Blockchain lead Anton Dek revealed the history of the CBEC and the methodology used to create the energy consumption estimates of its Bitcoin Electricity Consumption index. The Cambridge research associate said the team had noticed that other models that were trying to create accurate estimates of the Bitcoin network’s energy usage had used a implemented an effective approach, using data such as the amount miners spend on electricity. “These different machines all have known efficiencies, joules of energy they expend to solve hashes. Based on these assumptions, we built the index.” The index gives an estimated power consumption range, with its present theoretical lower bound annualized electrical consumption at 43.32 terawatt-hours to the theoretical upper bound at 476.18 TWh. The current estimate of Bitcoin’s present consumption is based on the assumption that miners use a mix of profitable hardware.

The CBECI website give away a global mining map which gives a breakdown of how the Bitcoin mining network is shared around the world. The map gives country-by-country hash rates, while China’s 12 provinces are also responsible for it, considering the fact that more than half of the world’s Bitcoin hash rate is situated in the country. “This is self-reported data by mining pools, so we have to trust these guys. But even if it’s all true, we only cover 37% of Bitcoin’s total hash rate from those three pools that provided information to us. If we extrapolate it to the total miners, we assume this is representativeness of this sample, which might not be true, given that we have more data from China. That’s something we’re going to improve on.” 

Dek believes, “If we look at the energy mix of every region, and then each country, we’ll be able to assume the energy mix and then we’ll be able to more accurately estimate the carbon emission factor.” anyways, Dek said other researchers has came to an estimate by taking the total annual power consumption of the Bitcoin network, around 130 terawatts-hour, and multiply this by the average carbon emission factor. “Its more complicated than this because I think the Bitcoin energy mix doesn’t fall in the average world mix doesn’t fall in the average world mix. The reason is that they use renewables, not because of their benevolence, but for purely economic reasons. Hydropower exists in abundance in some regions, and if you look on the Bitcoin mining map and China, the Sichuan region is still very important for mining.” The CBECI data shows the increase in the hash rate in the area during the wet season, where more rain reached a state of a more than sufficient power generated by swollen dams. “Even if mining is more efficient, there is much more mining done, and this means a larger impact.” 

Currency Exchange rate Buy cryptocurrency

The new DEFI platform enters the market! Earn passively - token sale 0.25 $

Dear customer,

We use cookies to provide our services correctly and safely. Cookies are small text-based data sets that shall be saved on the device you are using in connection with the use of this instnat website. Cookies are created in order to ensure proper functioning of thes instant website. By clicking the button "I accept and go to the website", you implicitly agree to creation of the cookies on your computer and to deploy automatic tracking and data collection and processing on behalf of the Lushup Holdings FZ LEE. Click the above-captioned button is also tantamount to accepting website's privacy policy. Closing the notification by means of "X" is unequivocally connected with your consent. If you do not agree to any of the above, please discontinue using our Website.

“Cookies” shall make an identification of the software used by you and to customization of this instant website to your needs. Cookies contain the name of the domain from which they origin, duration of period of their storage on your computer and an assigned value.

Third party cookies:
We also use third-party cookies for the following purposes:

  • creating statistics - helping to understand the way Users use the Website, which allows to improve its structure and content with use of the analytical tools
  • defining a user profile - in order to display custom-tailored content in advertising networks.

External entities that might be source of any third-party cookies on this instant Website are as follows:

Using a settings of your web browser or by using pre-set configuration tools available in our service you can independently and at any time change the settings concerning your use of the “cookies”, specifying the conditionsof their storage and how your device is creating and downloading them. These settings can be changed to block the automatic handling of cookies in the settings of your web browser or inform about their placement on your device each time.

Detailed information about the options related to use of “cookies” is available in the settings of your software (web browser).

Service privacy policy

This instant document lays out the principles of the Privacy Policy on the tokeneo.com/news/pl website (hereinafter referred to as the "Website" or "Service"). The administrator of the Website is Lushup Holdings FZ LEE, Fujairah - Creative Tower, P.O.Box 4422 Fujairah, United Arabs Emirates.

The full document to read the Tokeneo privacy policy is available in this document.

Advanced settings can be changed in your browser.